We should maintain that if an interpretation of any word in any religion leads to disharmony and does not positively further the welfare of the many, then such an interpretation is to be regarded as wrong; that is, against the will of God, or as the working of Satan or Mara.

Buddhadasa Bikkhu, a Thai Buddhist Monk


Wednesday, August 10, 2011

God & Reality: Science as a Resource

Following on  the previous post, "God & Reality (V)":

From its earliest days, Christians of various persuasions have persistently adapted their theologies, forms, and pious expressions to their surrounding cultures.  They have happily and successfully imported all sorts of things, such as Christmas trees and folk tunes, transforming them into "normal" everyday parts of their faith.  In our age, science is a central, essential element in modern culture and intellectual reflection.  Our task is to do with science what we have done with countless philosophies and cultural systems before it, which is to unashamedly and enthusiastically take from it whatever we can to better understand God's ongoing creation, the work of Christ, and the presence of the Spirit in our time.  Science isn't our enemy.  It is nothing more or less than a goldmine of insights, information, and ideas that we can use to best advantage as we see fit.

To use science to best advantage, however, we must give it due respect just as any workman respects her tools.  We must refrain from taking some stray idea and running with it heedless of the larger body of scientific theory.  Those who will be most helpful are individuals trained in both science and theology, such as John Polkinghorne as one example.  Those of us who aren't trained in science can poke around at the edges (which is what I've been doing here), but so much of science is so technical that we will not be able to see the deeper implications of science for theology.  On the other hand and as I've written before several times, scientists who play at theology without at least some theological training only hurt themselves—the so-called new atheists being the most blatant and abusive examples.

Our ultimate goal is to discover a deeper, more meaningful personal faith for ourselves—one that is grounded in both the traditions of the church and the modern world around us.  In general, Christian faiths have been largely incarnational faiths, which means that they see God in the real world around them.  Incarnational faiths begin with Christ, who was a real person, and with the Holy Spirit, who we take to be involved in real lives in our real world.  Ours is more of a worldly religion than not, more grounded in daily life than not.  This is especially true of Protestant faiths, which generally have rejected monasticism and for the most part ignored contemplation and meditation, emphasizing instead engagement with the world through service and evangelism.  For my part, I am convinced that our incarnational heritage inspires us to engage science in a positive, hopeful, and inquisitive way—seeking understanding, seeking truths.

Science is not our enemy.  It is not our friend.  It is just the latest in a long line of opportunities to think about God in Christ in new, culturally relevant ways.  Amen.