We should maintain that if an interpretation of any word in any religion leads to disharmony and does not positively further the welfare of the many, then such an interpretation is to be regarded as wrong; that is, against the will of God, or as the working of Satan or Mara.

Buddhadasa Bikkhu, a Thai Buddhist Monk


Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Zero Sum Dialogue

Politics as it is being played in our nation today has become what in theological terms we can only call "zero sum dialogue," which is the worst kind of dialogue there is.  Dialogue in religious circles is an exercise in listening and reflection in which individuals share their faith with those of another faith.  The goal is deeper understanding of both the other's faith and our own faith.  It is a peacemaking exercise.

On issue after issue, what we see happening in Washington and in the state caiptals is a forced dialogue concerning the very nature of government.  Small Government Conservatives are battling it out with Big Government Liberals in what Charles Krauthammer calls, "a once-in-a-generation debate about the nature of the welfare state." (here)  We've seen this forced dialogue at its most intense in the debate over the debt ceiling.  Because a decision had to be made given the potential economic (and political) risks, the two sides had to engage each other.  Each side had to moderate its expectations, demands, and ideology to accommodate the other side.  They had to listen and understand each other—at least, do a degree.  But the result has left the country more divided, angrier, and less peaceful rather than more.  It was and remains dialogue at gunpoint.

Zero sum dialogue frustrates the movement of the Holy Spirit.  It is thus profoundly uninspired and uninspiring.  It bruises egos.  It leaves a bad taste in the mouth.  It does not heal.  When we compromise In The Spirit everyone wins.  Conflict is dampened if not resolved.  When we compromise Without The Spirit everyone involved ultimately loses, and we lurch on to the next fight and the one after that and the one after that.  Conflict without end.