data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ecda/3ecdaad6e40a354080dca6d845c314171189a292" alt=""
On issue after issue, what we see happening in Washington and in the state caiptals is a forced dialogue concerning the very nature of government. Small Government Conservatives are battling it out with Big Government Liberals in what Charles Krauthammer calls, "a once-in-a-generation debate about the nature of the welfare state." (here) We've seen this forced dialogue at its most intense in the debate over the debt ceiling. Because a decision had to be made given the potential economic (and political) risks, the two sides had to engage each other. Each side had to moderate its expectations, demands, and ideology to accommodate the other side. They had to listen and understand each other—at least, do a degree. But the result has left the country more divided, angrier, and less peaceful rather than more. It was and remains dialogue at gunpoint.
Zero sum dialogue frustrates the movement of the Holy Spirit. It is thus profoundly uninspired and uninspiring. It bruises egos. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth. It does not heal. When we compromise In The Spirit everyone wins. Conflict is dampened if not resolved. When we compromise Without The Spirit everyone involved ultimately loses, and we lurch on to the next fight and the one after that and the one after that. Conflict without end.