We should maintain that if an interpretation of any word in any religion leads to disharmony and does not positively further the welfare of the many, then such an interpretation is to be regarded as wrong; that is, against the will of God, or as the working of Satan or Mara.

Buddhadasa Bikkhu, a Thai Buddhist Monk


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Biblical Birtherism


Birtherism is built on a falsehood so patently false that it betrays its own source: fear of the Other who is not us.  There is a racialist factor involved.  The President of the United States is a "person of color," and for a certain segment of the American public that fact is unsettling.  It demands a reaction, and for these folks that reaction is to deny that Barack Obama was born in the United States and has the legal right to hold the office of president.  They deny his right to be the president.

Would you believe there is biblical precedent?  In the Gospel of John, Jesus finds himself repeatedly in conflict with "the Jews," that is the educated, powerful ruling elite of his day.  For them, his message is outrageous, impious, and dangerous.  John records numerous confrontations between Jesus and these leaders.  In the heat of one of them, "the Jews" say to Jesus,"Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?" (John 8:48, NRSV)

For these wealthy establishment types, Jesus was the Other—a lower-class, uneducated Galilean who challenged their power and their way of looking at the world.  They responded to him in a number of ways including the charge that he was not "really" Jewish.  He was not "really" one of them.  As a despised Samaritan, he was their enemy and a faithless heretic.  In this way, they could dismiss him and justify their disdain for him.  It is interesting that they chose a racialist approach, one that removed Jesus from the race of God's people, the Jews, and reassigned him a place in the devil's race, the Samaritans.

Birtherism, in sum, is the reinvention of a very old wheel.