We should maintain that if an interpretation of any word in any religion leads to disharmony and does not positively further the welfare of the many, then such an interpretation is to be regarded as wrong; that is, against the will of God, or as the working of Satan or Mara.

Buddhadasa Bikkhu, a Thai Buddhist Monk


Sunday, February 12, 2012

How Come We Have to Have Churches?

From time to time someone will ask a pastor, why are churches even necessary?  We don't get the question often, but we do get it.  Paul Tillich, writing in his book, Dynamics of Faith (NY: HarperOne, 2009 [1957]),  gives what surely must be one of the most creative answers to the question of why humans need faith communities of some sort.  He argues that every spiritual act "is dependent on language and therefore on community."  It is in such communities that language lives, and, "Without language there is no act of faith, no religious experience!"  It is faith communities that create languages and symbols of faith, which can only be fully understood by the community.  Faith thus requires language, which means it requires a community.  Tillich concludes, "Only in a community of language can man actualize his faith." (p. 27)

Sixty-five years later, I suspect that many church-based thinkers would today answer that Christianity is really a long story that begins with Christ himself.  The church is the steward of the story.  It is the place where it is told, cherished, and preserved.  Tillich would probably answer that, yes, the church is the repository of Christianity's stories, but there are no stories without language.  He would be right.

Thus, we can only speak of Christian faith by drawing on the language spoken by the churches.  Without them there is no living faith.  As important an insight as this may be, it only reflect a larger truth, which is that no human institution can live without language.  Language lies at the core of what it means to be human.  It binds culture together in a way that nothing else does.  So, Tillich is right, but he also isn't saying anything that doesn't apply to human society more generally.  We can't live without language.  Still, the fundamental point here is that churches do not exist for the purpose of coercing faith or preserving certain kinds of dogma.  They are stewards of language, story, traditions, and much more all of which are elements of personal faith.

Individuals, of course, can and increasingly often these days do go it alone without belonging to churches.  They can only do that, however, because there are churches.  Once the native language speakers of Christianity die, so dies the language and the faith that depends on it.  So, yes, we have to have churches even if we personally go it alone.